Warning: array_merge(): Argument #1 is not an array in ..../includes/class_bootstrap.php(1419) : eval()'d code on line 34
[消息] 庫克發表公開訊息反對美國政府開後門監控的要求 - iPhone4.TW

會員登入



第1頁,共3頁 123 最後最後
顯示結果從 1 到 10 共計 28 條

混合查看

  1. #1
    吉米丘 的頭像

    勸敗大魔王

    註冊日期:09-20-2007
    文章:50,714
    謝謝你: 9,905
    在 6,553篇文章中獲得 48,053個感謝


    原文網址
    http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/

    原文指出,美國政府要求蘋果公司,針對去年12月發生的槍擊案,提供協助破解槍手的iPhone手機,並且提供必要的技術協助

    所以庫克隨即發表了公開信,反對這樣的行為



    現在人們透過手機大量儲存關於自己的各項資訊如私人對話、健康資訊、筆記、音樂行事曆...等等

    這些資料應該好好被保護在手機裡面避免駭客或是有心者竊取這些個人資料而作為其他用途

    人們希望蘋果以及其他科技公司能好好保護這些個人的重要資產,所以蘋果很認真的在確保這一切可以安全的被儲存與被保護...

    全文如下


    引用 作者: Tim Cook


    A Message to Our Customers


    The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand.

    This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.


    The Need for Encryption

    Smartphones, led by iPhone, have become an essential part of our lives. People use them to store an incredible amount of personal information, from our private conversations to our photos, our music, our notes, our calendars and contacts, our financial information and health data, even where we have been and where we are going.

    All that information needs to be protected from hackers and criminals who want to access it, steal it, and use it without our knowledge or permission. Customers expect Apple and other technology companies to do everything in our power to protect their personal information, and at Apple we are deeply committed to safeguarding their data.

    Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us.

    For many years, we have used encryption to protect our customers’ personal data because we believe it’s the only way to keep their information safe. We have even put that data out of our own reach, because we believe the contents of your iPhone are none of our business.


    The San Bernardino Case


    We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino last December. We mourn the loss of life and want justice for all those whose lives were affected. The FBI asked us for help in the days following the attack, and we have worked hard to support the government’s efforts to solve this horrible crime. We have no sympathy for terrorists.

    When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it. Apple complies with valid subpoenas and search warrants, as we have in the San Bernardino case. We have also made Apple engineers available to advise the FBI, and we’ve offered our best ideas on a number of investigative options at their disposal.

    We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.

    Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.

    The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.


    The Threat to Data Security

    Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case.

    In today’s digital world, the “key” to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.

    The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.

    The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe.

    We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them.


    A Dangerous Precedent

    Rather than asking for legislative action through Congress, the FBI is proposing an unprecedented use of the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority.

    The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by “brute force,” trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer.

    The implications of the government’s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone’s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.

    Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.

    We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.

    While we believe the FBI’s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products. And ultimately, we fear that this demand would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect.

    Tim Cook

    今天法官要求Apple協助FBI偵查San Bernardino一案中,破解槍手手機內的資訊

    甚至希望在產品中安插某種方式(例如後門)可以用來監控或是蒐集使用者資訊

    如果你是企業主,今天FBI上門要求你這樣做,我們該怎麼做?

    所以庫克就乾脆講出來

    不然哪天被人家發現開後門,不就更大條

    但是直接這樣跟美國政府對槓,也不是小菜一碟耶
    此篇文章於 02-17-2016 23:13 被 吉米丘 編輯。



  2. #2
    吉米丘 的頭像

    勸敗大魔王

    註冊日期:09-20-2007
    文章:50,714
    謝謝你: 9,905
    在 6,553篇文章中獲得 48,053個感謝
    這部份好像之前黃律師也提到

    若今天檢方跑來找我們,要求我提供某個人的連線資料,我到底該不該提供呢?


  3. #3

    海盜船長

    註冊日期:05-05-2010
    文章:81
    謝謝你: 3
    在 8篇文章中獲得 20個感謝
    作為一個跨國企業因該是用同一套道德標準
    如果答應米國政府要求,那426政府要求叛亂分子的手機一樣要解碼他拿什麼拒絕
    當然 每個國家都會操作愛國、道德語論逼企業主就範

    一旦就範就因該任何一國家要求都會提出要求!!


  4. #4
    kuanwei 的頭像

    海盜船長

    註冊日期:10-18-2009
    文章:639
    謝謝你: 85
    在 130篇文章中獲得 365個感謝
    有時真的很佩服這些西方堅持的人權價值觀,Apple 大可安靜的配合FBI跟法院的要求,對企業本身是風險最小也最簡單的作法。

    但是Apple 決定起身對抗他們覺得不合理的做法,這對公關一定是有不好的影響,尤其是這個案子本身是恐攻,沒有仔細去想的話,會覺得這有甚麼大不了,但是看過上面的公開信內容後我可以理解法院的這個要求的潛在風險實在很大。


  5. #5

    剛加入我們

    註冊日期:12-31-2011
    文章:23
    謝謝你: 0
    在 2篇文章中獲得 2個感謝
    美國口口聲聲講人權,但是沒人敢跟美國的警察哈啦的,希望庫克加油


  6. #6
    k3859618 的頭像

    超熱血的愛用者

    註冊日期:10-22-2011
    文章:1,973
    謝謝你: 1,252
    在 174篇文章中獲得 275個感謝
    這讓我想到美國海關鎖,海關檢查很方便了,但小偷也很方便


  7. #7

    超熱血的愛用者

    註冊日期:07-10-2009
    文章:803
    謝謝你: 102
    在 84篇文章中獲得 228個感謝
    雖然我本身也不太贊成,但是想要提出來供大家參考

    如果今天有一支”iPhone”裏面很有可能(或許只有百分之一的機率)存有資料可以避免恐攻,而拯救眾多生命,在跟時間賽跑之下,如果你是政府,你會如何做?
    當然大家可以說這是電影中的情節,現實是不可能發生,911發生之前,大部分的人決對沒想到去用民用載客機去撞世貿大樓。

    沒錯,我同意Apple站出來說,政府這種要求很危險,但是另一方面,Apple也有義務提供一些技術上的協助(用電腦去解碼,在緊急之下,是不可行)。

    常常聽道很多人對在美國坐飛機很有意見,覺得被不公平對待,隱私受侵犯,我個人倒是認為,我寧願犧牲一些方便性,甚至隱私(像是被搜身),換來平平安安到達目的地,如果你今天有家人常常飛,我想你也會感同身受。

    Privacy是重要,Security也不容忽視,如何取得平衡,是一項挑戰,也是一種藝術,今天Apple用先進科技,保護客戶隱私,不遺餘力,但是我也希望Apple也能幫助有關單位,避免有心人濫用,而危害大眾。
    此篇文章於 02-18-2016 19:29 被 larrylo 編輯。



  8. #8
    kuanwei 的頭像

    海盜船長

    註冊日期:10-18-2009
    文章:639
    謝謝你: 85
    在 130篇文章中獲得 365個感謝
    引用 作者: larrylo 查看文章
    沒錯,我同意Apple站出來說,政府這種要求很危險,但是另一方面,Apple也有義務提供一些技術上的協助(用電腦去解碼,在緊急之下,是不可行)。
    大家一起討論討論,這個案子Apple本來就有提供技術協助,在他們的現有的能力範圍內。

    今天Tim Cook會站出來寫這封信是因為法院要求Apple去"製作"一個現在並不存在的後門,一旦這個後門開了,我們可以想像類似的要求只會越來越多。

    沒錯,也許有些特殊狀況下,能夠使用後門會有很多優點跟便利的地方。但是相對的一旦後門被做出來了,所有的iOS設備也暴露在潛在的危險中。

    大家心中隱私權的線到底該畫在哪裡?似乎是沒有正確答案的。不過個人的觀察,美國人的線似乎比我們來的更靠近重視人權。



  9. #9
    吉米丘 的頭像

    勸敗大魔王

    註冊日期:09-20-2007
    文章:50,714
    謝謝你: 9,905
    在 6,553篇文章中獲得 48,053個感謝
    歡迎大家討論囉

    記得有一個電影「啟動原始碼」也是期望透過科技去找出恐怖攻擊的嫌犯以及下一個目標

    確實現在全世界籠罩在恐怖攻擊的陰影下


    我們沒在做壞事的,確實沒什麼好怕的要看來看,要查來查

    但是一體兩面,若今天上門的是假FBI,或是有歹徒有了這個鑰匙可以偷看每個人的祕密

    這又難搞了


  10. #10
    Marty6891 的頭像

    超熱血的愛用者

    註冊日期:01-19-2010
    文章:739
    謝謝你: 11
    在 164篇文章中獲得 497個感謝
    發現一個有趣的事實,在這個情況下,密碼比指紋來的安全,直接把嫌犯指紋壓上去就好了,密碼反而無解!! 我就是忘記了呀!!!!


 

 

相似的主題

  1. [影片] 美國Fox新聞台獨家揭露iPhone 5發表會上沒公開的新功能
    由chanhan論壇中iPhone 最新消息
    回覆: 13
    最後發表: 09-19-2012, 03:24
  2. [消息] 標案贏家 Pro - 專為政府招標訊息打造的業務工具
    由popcat論壇中AppStore 軟體推薦區
    回覆: 8
    最後發表: 07-11-2012, 17:40
  3. [消息] 關於 iWork.com 公開測試版的重要服務訊息
    由吉米丘論壇中Mac 最新消息區
    回覆: 6
    最後發表: 03-19-2012, 10:09
  4. [消息] 關於 iWork.com 公開測試版的重要服務訊息
    由吉米丘論壇中首頁新聞
    回覆: 0
    最後發表: 03-16-2012, 15:55

發文規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以發表回覆
  • 不可以上傳附件
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •  
回到此頁頂端