[新聞稿] App Store 訂閱服務正式發表 - iPhone4.TW

會員登入



第1頁,共2頁 12 最後最後
顯示結果從 1 到 10 共計 11 條
  1. #1
    吉米丘 的頭像

    勸敗大魔王

    註冊日期:09-20-2007
    文章:50,711
    謝謝你: 9,906
    在 6,553篇文章中獲得 48,053個感謝

    蘋果在稍早提供的新聞稿上宣布:App Store的新訂閱服務模式,包含雜誌、報紙、影片、音樂等,都將有新的訂購方式


    我們簡單的說重點好了


    Apple要求大家將訂閱功能,直接做在軟體(app)裡面,也就是俗稱的In-Game Purchase或是In-App Purchase

    ---------------------------------------------------

    若今天這個客人,是透過Apple的關係,知道了這個訊息,進而透過軟體內的In-App Purchase來訂閱你的內容

    那阿婆收取這個訂閱費用的30%

    ---------------------------------------------------

    若今天這個客人,本來就是你的客人,或是透過你自己的行銷方式去產生的訂閱內容需求,則Apple不拿半毛,經營者拿100%的費用

    但是,經營者不能在軟體中提供外連的連結,連到自己官網的付費區塊去規避這個issue

    ---------------------------------------------------

    至於定價策略,則是必須相同於市場售價,或是低於市場售價

    不能自己打自己


    所以我們簡單總結一下

    客人是阿婆帶來的,支付30%給阿婆

    客人是自己帶來的,支付0%給阿婆


    其實就全球行銷的角度看,fair enough


    新聞稿原文
    CUPERTINO, California-February 15, 2011-Apple® today announced a new subscription service available to all publishers of content-based apps on the App Store℠, including magazines, newspapers, video, music, etc. This is the same innovative digital subscription billing service that Apple recently launched with News Corp.'s "The Daily" app.

    Subscriptions purchased from within the App Store will be sold using the same App Store billing system that has been used to buy billions of apps and In-App Purchases. Publishers set the price and length of subscription (weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, bi-yearly or yearly). Then with one-click, customers pick the length of subscription and are automatically charged based on their chosen length of commitment (weekly, monthly, etc.). Customers can review and manage all of their subscriptions from their personal account page, including canceling the automatic renewal of a subscription. Apple processes all payments, keeping the same 30 percent share that it does today for other In-App Purchases.

    "Our philosophy is simple-when Apple brings a new subscriber to the app, Apple earns a 30 percent share; when the publisher brings an existing or new subscriber to the app, the publisher keeps 100 percent and Apple earns nothing," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "All we require is that, if a publisher is making a subscription offer outside of the app, the same (or better) offer be made inside the app, so that customers can easily subscribe with one-click right in the app. We believe that this innovative subscription service will provide publishers with a brand new opportunity to expand digital access to their content onto the iPad, iPod touch and iPhone, delighting both new and existing subscribers."

    Publishers who use Apple's subscription service in their app can also leverage other methods for acquiring digital subscribers outside of the app. For example, publishers can sell digital subscriptions on their web sites, or can choose to provide free access to existing subscribers. Since Apple is not involved in these transactions, there is no revenue sharing or exchange of customer information with Apple. Publishers must provide their own authentication process inside the app for subscribers that have signed up outside of the app. However, Apple does require that if a publisher chooses to sell a digital subscription separately outside of the app, that same subscription offer must be made available, at the same price or less, to customers who wish to subscribe from within the app. In addition, publishers may no longer provide links in their apps (to a web site, for example) which allow the customer to purchase content or subscriptions outside of the app.

    Protecting customer privacy is a key feature of all App Store transactions. Customers purchasing a subscription through the App Store will be given the option of providing the publisher with their name, email address and zip code when they subscribe. The use of such information will be governed by the publisher's privacy policy rather than Apple's. Publishers may seek additional information from App Store customers provided those customers are given a clear choice, and are informed that any additional information will be handled under the publisher's privacy policy rather than Apple's.

    The revolutionary App Store offers more than 350,000 apps to consumers in 90 countries, with more than 60,000 native iPad™ apps. Customers of the more than 160 million iOS devices around the world can choose from an incredible range of apps in 20 categories, including games, business, news, sports, health, reference and travel.

    Apple designs Macs, the best personal computers in the world, along with OS X, iLife, iWork, and professional software. Apple leads the digital music revolution with its iPods and iTunes online store. Apple is reinventing the mobile phone with its revolutionary iPhone and App Store, and has recently introduced its magical iPad which is defining the future of mobile media and computing devices.
    此篇文章於 02-15-2011 22:56 被 吉米丘 編輯。


  2. #2

    超熱血的愛用者

    註冊日期:12-04-2008
    文章:575
    謝謝你: 5
    在 5篇文章中獲得 7個感謝
    所以這種廣告要有交易行為才收廣告費,比其他的廣告只要點閱就要收錢好太多了,也公平多了!!


  3. #3
    tung991 的頭像

    超熱血的愛用者

    註冊日期:03-31-2010
    文章:2,000
    謝謝你: 177
    在 41篇文章中獲得 99個感謝
    可是apple 怎麼去分別誰是它帶來的?


  4. #4
    netdef 的頭像

    海盜船長

    註冊日期:10-22-2009
    文章:383
    謝謝你: 15
    在 37篇文章中獲得 75個感謝
    比如MagV一年訂閱39$,如果在網站上販售你序號,一樣是39$。

    然後輸入到iPad,一樣開啓一年訂閱的權利,這樣就是透過自己的管道販售?只要app裡面不要提供連到這個販售序號的網址即可?


  5. #5
    吉米丘 的頭像

    勸敗大魔王

    註冊日期:09-20-2007
    文章:50,711
    謝謝你: 9,906
    在 6,553篇文章中獲得 48,053個感謝
    引用 作者: netdef 查看文章
    比如MagV一年訂閱39$,如果在網站上販售你序號,一樣是39$。

    然後輸入到iPad,一樣開啓一年訂閱的權利,這樣就是透過自己的管道販售?只要app裡面不要提供連到這個販售序號的網址即可?
    對,應該是類似這種方式


  6. #6
    netdef 的頭像

    海盜船長

    註冊日期:10-22-2009
    文章:383
    謝謝你: 15
    在 37篇文章中獲得 75個感謝
    早上聽廣播,說國外媒體業開始哭,說利潤很低,根本沒有辦法分30%給Apple,覺得這樣強人所難。

    看來還要角力一陣子吧~


  7. #7

    剛加入我們

    註冊日期:12-27-2010
    文章:20
    謝謝你: 0
    在 0篇文章中獲得 0個感謝
    Google 已經馬上跟進了,只抽10%,若是利用 Google checkout 付費的話再外收2%。

    有競爭是好事,但 Google 你能不能別只能跟在後面跑,先把 Android Market 搞好再說?


  8. #8
    netdef 的頭像

    海盜船長

    註冊日期:10-22-2009
    文章:383
    謝謝你: 15
    在 37篇文章中獲得 75個感謝
    雖然要Apple & google 完全不抽也不可能,但是媒體業近年來的競爭,利潤不夠讓人抽成,似乎也是很合理。

    還是有熟知媒體業的人可以發表意見~XD

    其實這件事影響深遠呢~媒體版圖也許會開始改觀唷....


  9. #9

    新生報到

    註冊日期:04-27-2009
    文章:8
    謝謝你: 0
    在 0篇文章中獲得 0個感謝
    30%這樣實在太高了,線上音樂收費已經有一半要付給版權,再加上30%,根本無利可圖。


  10. #10

    剛加入我們

    註冊日期:12-27-2010
    文章:20
    謝謝你: 0
    在 0篇文章中獲得 0個感謝
    我目前的想法是30%高或不高可能最終還是要由媒體的總收入來決定。低的就會成功?似乎也未必。

    拿最簡單國內的情況來說,Y拍收的高還是沒屋頂收的高?很明顯是前者,但是Y拍生意仍然明顯比後者好很多,賣家們叫歸叫,真的因此轉台放棄Y拍的人很多最後都還是默默回頭。

    前幾天國外有一份關於2010年行動裝置應用程式營收的統計。第一名當然是 Apple (佔82.7%)猜也猜的到,但是第二名卻居然是僅僅只有一萬多個 app 的黑莓商店 (佔7.7%, 美金一億六千五百萬)。號稱20萬 app 的 Android Market (就算只有3成是付費 app 也應該有6萬個) 排名第四 (4.7%, 美金一億零二百萬)。

    當然 Android Market 絕大部份都是靠點擊廣告為生(我不知道這樣到底有多少人能賺多少),所以上述的結果只能當參考。只是如果使用群的付費習慣如果是雷同的,那...就算少20%的佣金不見得會是比較划算的選擇,何況 Apple 並沒有完全斷了你的生路 (如果你有辦法讓做用者願意跳出去改成直接到你的網站上完成付費程序的話)。

    不過這當然還是要看後續的發展囉。看來2011的戲還長的很。


 

 

相似的主題

  1. [求助] 加購APP的問題(不是從APP STORE)
    由azxdr111論壇中AppStore 軟體推薦區
    回覆: 5
    最後發表: 07-30-2010, 05:01
  2. [消息] app store出現了輸入法的app
    由peter3257385論壇中iPhone 最新消息
    回覆: 4
    最後發表: 04-11-2009, 23:06

發文規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以發表回覆
  • 不可以上傳附件
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •  
回到此頁頂端